So Collingwood Town Council spent 45 minutes debating whether the budget for the housing task force should be $25,000, $5,000, or $15,000.

Forty-five minutes to debate something that has the same financial implications of whether I get one more Tim Hortons steeped tea… annually.

And on a topic that has far-reaching sustainability issues… something this town is supposedly concerned about. Certainly more far-reaching then OKing $25,000 for an honorarium so one of its members can be (potentially) president of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (you remember them, the guys who gave us four-year municipal terms)…

Perhaps Collingwood fire chief Trent Elyea could have spoken slower, and used smaller, simpler words.

Like, “Save. People. Good.”

Evidently, his message wasn’t quite getting through to people around the council table; well, with the exception of councillors Ian Chadwick and Kathy Jeffery.

The rest, though, had a tough time with the concept of what it means to add an extra guy (or girl) to a shift. Adding that extra person could mean the difference between a structure being saved, or a life-or-death situation. It ain’t that complex.

Council also has a raft of studies and reports, going back to the mid-’90s, telling them what they need to do with the fire department. The most recent, in 2002, was an Ontario Fire Marshal report that told them they needed to go from three people on a shift to four (which the firefighters’ association had been saying for years, but administration had been resisting), that a deputy-chief needed to be hired for succession planning (that took six years — even after the town went through the process at least twice and in the end didn’t hire until after Trent came on board), and a second fire hall would be needed — likely in the west end — in order to ensure proper response time.

That last one has also been contemplated through the town’s strategic plan (under the consideration of a master plan for the fire department) — which council has approved (in case they forgot). Oh yeah, Trent told them back in 2008 they need a master plan, so it’s not like this council didn’t have it on their radar.

At recently as last fall, the town had been in discussions with a property owner in the east end for a piece of land (I was under the impression a tentative deal had been struck), and the mayor noted in a story last week discussion had taken place with the new Goodyear property owner for a chunk of that land for a west end fire hall (presumably, at that point, the fire department would abandon the Ontario Street headquarters, or maybe leave a truck there for a recall crew).

That second hall, wherever it may be, isn’t contemplated until at least 2012 or 2013. At which point, as Trent indicated, the current crews would be modified, either three and three, or four and two.

Pretty simple. Pricey, yes, but simple.

At the moment, a crew of four (out of a shift of five) could show up to your burning home, but not be able to go in and save your precious collection of Jim Nabors’ albums because there aren’t enough guys (or girls) on the ground to undertake entry; they have to wait for the recall crew to show up, and that could be five minutes, 10 minutes, 20 minutes — at which point your autographed copy of Jim Nabors Sings the Lord’s Prayer would be a sticky pile of black goo.

With five or six, not only could the firefighters do an entry and save Jim Nabors, they might even be able to rescue that ochre-and-puce-coloured bedspread your great-aunt gave you that you keep tucked in the back of a closet after the cat had kittens on it.

And if there’s two fire halls, if the crew of two shows up first, you can be assured the second crew of four wouldn’t be far behind (like by a minute, based on the response time in town). The first crew can set up the pumper, so by the time the second crew shows up on the scene they can get right to work (Councillor Tim McNabb, notably, couldn’t seem to get his head around the idea of a crew of two showing up at the scene and having to wait for a second crew: it’s simple — they wouldn’t send out one crew, then the other. On a call, everybody gets called out, and it’s just a matter of which truck shows up at the scene first.)

The other element was trying to compare Collingwood to what other municipalities do — again, council had a difficult time understanding Trent’s statement that every municipality is different and has to determine it’s own service levels.

Let’s see: let’s find a small urban municipality of 20,000 people in the midst of a high-traffic resort area, that has several high-rise buildings (six-storey-plus), an ethanol plant using a wet mill process, a whisky distillery, several other associated industries, a landfill, a hospital, and a nearby airport. Throw in a 10-minute response time.

Or, just listen to the recommendation of the guy who’s an expert, has been in firefighting for nearly 30 years, including several years as a fire chief in a small city and was recognized as an innovator who left a department in better shape then when he found it. As Orillia mayor Ron Stevens put it when Elyea resigned his post over there to take the job here, “His job was to give us a No. 1 fire department, and he’s done that.”

Trent’s not trying to build an empire — he’s trying to build a service that’s responsive to the growth of the community, while ensuring that the inherent risk of firefighting for the men and women who work for him is minimized.

Town council has to remember they’re in the service delivery biz, and that includes the delivery of public safety. And you can’t scrimp on safety…

First off, a plug: Collingwood will play host to a literary festival this September. The initial details are in today’s edishun of the Enterprise-Bulletin, but it should be a good time based on some of the planning discussion.

A website should be going on line in the not-to-distant future…

Next up, this outdoor rink business seems to be heating up, with a Facebook site that has 70 ‘fans’ as of, like, right now, plus a petition with more than 260 names (thus far…) and a blog.

As hard as I try, I’m still having a hard time trying to find people who are “pleased” with Stephen Harper’s decision to prorogue parliament — in spite of what our MP Helena Guergis says. I haven’t received one letter supporting it — though I have had several from regular folks with no political affiliation who are quite incensed by the whole thing. And our on-line poll at the E-B presently has a 2-1 lead over people who disagree with the MP.

Speaking of the MP, Willowdale representative Martha Hall-Findlay isn’t very impressed the Minister of State for the Status of Women bailed on a news program she and Helena were scheduled to appear on. I guess those would have been questions Martha could have asked during Question Period — if Parliament had been sitting, that is…

Speaking of proroguing, here’s a vid clip of local Liberal candidate Andrea Matrosovs speaking at the CAPP rally in Barrie last Saturday…

I have to thank the folks at the Collingwood General & Marine Hospital Foundation for providing a sense of perspective last night at Collingwood Town Council.

The foundation, which fundraises the capital equipment requirements for the hospital, came to council with an ‘ask’ of $1 per household, or about $10,000.

While $10,000 may be quite a bit for you and I, when it comes to municipal coffers it is but a drop in the bucket. And it gives a bit of a dose of reality to some of the debate about council’s donation account that went on last week, and are detailed over at Councillor Chadwick’s blog.

One of the things that was argued over — and at the moment I can’t remember the group in question — was whether to give a community organization $2,000, $1,000, or nothing at all; Councillor Mike Edwards actually made the comment at one point that $1,000 is “a lot of money.” Councillors took about 25 minutes or so wrestling with the question.

Yes, to you or me, it is a lot of money. But to the town? A quick calculation — based on the hospital foundation’s ‘ask’, and a municipal operating budget of a little over $36 million — is that $1,000 is infinitesimal. I worked it out, and came up with a figure that had a decimal point with a string of numbers behind it and ended with an ‘e-5′; multiplying it by the property taxes I expect to pay in 2010, and it came to a nickel. Yep, five cents.

And that’s what we’re doing, arguing about nickels, and dimes, and the occassional quarter; I typically lose more money in my couch cushions than what council would have saved me during that 25-minute debate. That’s what most of the huffing and puffing comes down to when it comes to budget time, but it looks good in front of the camera because we’re supposedly being responsible for taxpayers’ money. It’s probably costing taxpayers more in the salaries we’re paying department heads to sit there and avoid looking bored, or worse, frustrated.

Councillors gloss over the big numbers. For instance, the costs of the OPP contract in 2010 is a shade over $4.7 million, or 12 per cent of the operating budget. Yet, did councillors ask for up-to-date crime statistics last night when it was presented? A business plan? Are the programs the OPP have in place working in the community? Do they need to be enhanced? There was a brief – very brief – discussion about the snowmobiles officers will use to patrol the trails.

In all, councillors spent about two minutes discussing what the town will spend on policing. But then another topic came up involving a tiny amount of money, and suddenly it was back into micromanagement mode again. The worse thing is they do this year-in, year-out. And year-in, year-out, afterward, say things need to be done differently so they aren’t spending a whole bunch of time focused on small amounts of money.

At the end of the day, councillors aren’t saving anything by pinching pennies, and may actually be adding to the municipal tax bill…

The Enterprise-Bulletin’s photos of yesterday’s Haitian Hearts concert at Fairways, taken by the E-B’s weekend photog/reporter Sharon Weatherall, are now on the E-B’s photo gallery page. A full report will be in Wednesday’s e-dish-un, of course…

Collingwood Councillor Norman Sandberg stated on Monday night he has his eyes on the presidency of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario.

Sandberg has also filed as a candidate for deputy-mayor in the Oct. 25 municipal election.

Here’s the thing: having political ambitions is one thing, but to be politically ambitious is another – and if people perceive someone is using one position in order to springboard to the next, well, it usually doesn’t turn out to well.

Take, for instance, the 2003 deputy-mayor campaign between then-incumbant Tim McNabb, and Councillor Sandra Cooper. The election was McNabb’s to lose, and there were a couple of things that sunk him.

The first was the condition – at the time – of the former incinerator site in the west end of Collingwood. The county had been sitting on a closure plan since it took over waste management in the early ’90s (as a former landfill site, the property automatically became the county’s). By the time I wandered on the property in the fall of 2003 (a little investigative journalism), aside from stumbling across a small grow-op (the county claimed it ‘monitored’ the site on a regular basis – SNORT!), I also found evidence of exposed garbage and several other matters that should have been dealt with in a closure plan and never were. The site had never been closed properly – which was especially a concern as it sat on top of an acquifer that supplied water to several homes between the site and Georgian Bay.

(As a side note, by next spring the county had a closure plan and was actively dealing with the property – which was a long way from telling me in the fall there were ‘no problems’…)

McNabb tried to explain away the problems, and was steadfast in his defence of the county - until Cooper, at an all-candidate’s debate, held up a bottle of water touted as having come off the site, and asked McNabb if there were no issues with the site he should have no problem drinking the water. He didn’t drink, and that was the first nail in the coffin…

The second nail was during that same all-candidate’s meeting, McNabb declared that he was going to be the next warden of the county. That went over like a lead balloon, and needless to say, Cooper handily won the election.

Now, Sandberg may lose for other reasons, not only just because people won’t be impressed that he thinks he can use the deputy-mayor spot as a springboard to an AMO presidency – even though that in itself is a little (a lot) presumptous.

For one thing, I’m sure there are a few people who remember his 2000 mayor campaign, which was notable for being spineless and cheesy (for example, in a news release issued by the Sandberg campaign, the candidate declared that if elected he would limit his spending in the mayor’s discretionary account. “I’m not saying there’s a problem now, though, it’s just that I won’t do it,” a response he said to several issues that – in his own weasely way – he was trying to intimate that there were problems.

And this term, where Sandberg has basically been famous for pushing reverse-angle parking (generally abhored by everyone) and never losing faith in the mayor.

The other aspect to all of this is the cost of having him as president of AMO. As Councillor Ian Chadwick notes on his blog, (and as I wrote in the E-B on Friday), the costs for AMO have escalated. And when it comes down to spending $25,000 annually – exclusive of the town’s AMO dues, which are about $3,900 – in order for a council member to have their flight, hotel, meals and conference fees paid for, versus $25,000 that could be split among local community groups (for instance, the United Way asked for $12,500, and was turned down on Monday), I would think ratepayers will opt for the latter…

I’m pretty sure it wasn’t a typo on our part; Simcoe-Grey MP Helena Guergis told us this week everyone she speaks to about the prorogation of parliament is “pleased” the government is “taking a step back”:

“I am familiar with that, but that’s certainly not what I’ve heard when they (people) come into my constituency office and we have a conversation about taking a step back and recalibrating and taking a look at the global economic crisis,” said Guergis. “It is important that we take a step back and take a look at the agenda and make sure we are on the right track.”

Instead of outrage, Guergis said people are “pleased” with the shutdown.

I’m sure it would be an interesting argument to take to tomorrow’s rally in Barrie at the Fred Grant Memorial Square from 1 until 4 p.m. If she were invited, I have no doubt Helena would be able to explain — calmly and rationally — perfectly appropriate reasons to halt the business of government (as long as the PMO provided her with the script, obviously). Because the 200,000-plus people who have joined the Facebook site are obviously delusional (and probably Taliban supporters). And the 1,000 people who have signed up on a Facebook site supporting Harper and his decision to prorogue parliament are the true patriots.

Because even local Conservatives I speak to on a regular basis (generally the non-Kool-Aid drinking type) are shaking their heads on this one…

… that is, friends don’t let friends register porn sites in their name…

Collingwood council hopeful Norm Minnikin (he has also posted comments to the previous entry) tells me today that no one was as surprised as he was to find out his name listed as the registrant for a website that’s otherwise NSFW.

As he says, a friend had a brainwave to register the site, asked Norm to do it for him about four years ago (the registration, as can be seen on the whois site, was in 2006), and was supposed to change the registrant name that night. Four years ago.

DOH!

So aside from being a little too trusting of his friends, Norm sounds like an otherwise upstanding family guy with solid working class roots; he’s a former Goodyear employee and has lived in the area for the last 16 or 17 years. And, evidently, a good sense of humour as well…

As he told me this afternoon, he’s “looking forward to being a positive voice” in the campaign and at the council table. And while he’s not as familiar with the issues as he’d like to be, it sounds like he’s doing his homework — telling me he’s picked up some planning and other municipal documents in order to get up to speed.

It’s just a bit of an awkward way to kick off a campaign – and maybe a lesson to other council hopefuls: ‘Googling’ yourself before filing may be advised, or, at the very least, getting a news release out at the same time to prevent an idle reporter’s typing fingers from being inquisitive on the Interweb…

NON-NUDITY UPDATE: The whois listing for cougarstalker-dot-com has been changed to the rightful owner…

Councillor Ian Chadwick has always said he’d like to see council candidates who were a little more Internet-savvy…

I was checking to see who had filed for municipal election today, and saw a name I didn’t recognize; a little bit of a Google search, and this is what came up. The pertinent details have been confirmed, BTW…

Needless to say, as a family-friendly blog, I won’t be linking to the site in question – and I don’t recommend checking it out at your place of employment as it is definitely NSFW. And, I guess, we always want people on council who have a bit of an entrepreneurial background.

No word yet on whether the ‘talent’ is, uh, local…

But it should add a bit of a spark to this October’s municipal election…

EXPERIMENTAL UPDATE: I can only imagine what happens to my page views when I use the words ‘Cougar’ and ‘Stalker’; of course, there are legit reasons for cougar stalking, such as searching for pumas in the Blue Mountain area

Councillor Tim McNabb’s proposal to give the Blue Mountains a ‘grant’ so they can sit at the regional airport board table smacks a little of paternalism, and is pretty typical of the thinking that used to permeate through town hall about 15 years ago.

The discussion goes something like this: “We know what’s good for you. What’s good for Collingwood is good for everyone. However, what you may decide is good for you isn’t necessarily good for us…”

Basically, we’re telling the Blue Mountains that they obviously don’t know what’s good for them, so in order to get them to do what we want, we’re going to goad and embarrass them. Here’s $25,000, we tell as we pat them on the head, so why don’t you just behave and do as we say.

It’s terrible politics, and it’s even worse policy.

If I was a councillor in the Blue Mountains — even one who supported the town getting involved on the airport board and paying $25,000 toward the facility’s operation, like Clearview Township and Wasaga Beach — I would be outraged. Their council has made the decision — rightly or wrongly — and we have to respect it.

(Actually, if I was a councillor for the Blue Mountains, my response would be two words I can’t even use on the Internet…)

It’s no different than if Collingwood council were to make a decision; at the end the day, some people around the table may not agree with it, the town’s code of ethics require councillors to respect the decision-making process.

On the other side, Wasaga Beach and Clearview must be left scratching their heads. “Why are we bothering to pony up $25 G on an annual basis if Collingwood is just going to give seats away for free?”

I can only imagine the reaction if the Blue Mountains, or Clearview, attempted to pull some big brother stunt like that. “Hey, Collingwood, you’re not doing what we want so we’re going to embarrass you.” McNabb would probably be the first one to take offense.

If McNabb’s smart, he’d pull this ridiculous suggestion off the table…

Next Page »